R-sig-Epi Digest, Vol 49, Issue 4

https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-epi
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
r-sig-epi-request at r-project.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
r-sig-epi-owner at r-project.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of R-sig-Epi digest..."


Today's Topics:

  1. Re: LD between diallelic and multiallelic loci (Neil Shephard)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 11:33:24 +0000
From: Neil Shephard <nshephard at gmail.com>
To: r-sig-epi at r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-sig-Epi] LD between diallelic and multiallelic loci
Message-ID:
<AANLkTim77omxm_64-vDnyOzUAB_+cYpt5+EHN5w1zDjg at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011  ?<kudryavtseva_kathrin at ngs.ru> wrote:
To: r-sig-epi at r-project.org
Subject: [R-sig-Epi] LD between diallelic and multiallelic loci
Message-ID: <4D3ECC88.5060401 at ngs.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain

Dear all,

I am planning to analyse linkage between two loci( first - diallelic,
second - multiallelic (HLA-DRB1)). What function should i use?
Usually I use LD(data) function but it doesn't work if number of locus'
alleles more then 2.

I don't know which package the LD() function comes from, but you could
try some of the packages listed at
http://cran.r-project.org/web/views/Genetics.html

Neil

-- 
?Truth in science can be defined as the working hypothesis best suited
to open the way to the next better one.? - Konrad Lorenz

Email - nshephard at gmail.com
Website - http://kimura.no-ip.org/
Photos - http://www.flickr.com/photos/slackline/



------------------------------

_______________________________________________
R-sig-Epi mailing list
R-sig-Epi at r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-epi


End of R-sig-Epi Digest, Vol 49, Issue 4
****************************************