Message-ID: <CALEXWq1CujUCs=GLaVBLAttp4Ycr6wcQHRywWOt2HOXUbBQFWw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: 2020-06-26T09:47:13Z
From: Iñaki Ucar
Subject: R 4.0.0 rebuild status
In-Reply-To: <1666506.VLH7GnMWUR@myth>
On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 11:36, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 23 June 2020 16.48.53 WEST Tom Callaway wrote:
> > There are a few of those, but not many.
>
> Hi Tom,
> I noticed that for example in R-assertthat you have used the bcond:
>
> %bcond_with check
>
> would not it be better to use bootstrap instead to take advantage of:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bootstrapping
>
> I am asking for curiosity since from now on we will need to do this dance once
> a year for the releases that we deem worth (I would expect that to be rawhide
> and the latest stable).
>
> Forgive me if the question does not make sense since I am still trying to make
> sense of this maze. :-)
I used bcond locally and wrongly assumed that fedpkg build would
support --with BCOND and --without BCOND. Instead, the way to activate
it is to change to "%bcond_with check" and then revert to
"%bcond_without check". The only difference with bootstrap is that
"bootstrap" is recognized and a suffix ~bootstrap can be added
automatically to the resulting build. So the question is whether we
want that suffix or not.
--
I?aki ?car