Skip to content
Prev 7158 / 15274 Next

ks test to compare manager alphas.

A better method would be to use the bootstrap technique described by Wolfe
and Wunderli. This explicitly controls for the issue of multiple testing.
Similar techniques for controlling data snooping biases are implemented
ttrTest package. 
http://www.iew.uzh.ch/wp/iewwp445.pdf


-----Original Message-----
From: r-sig-finance-bounces at r-project.org
[mailto:r-sig-finance-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Burns
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 1:38 AM
To: r-sig-finance at r-project.org; BChiquoine at tiff.org
Subject: Re: [R-SIG-Finance] ks test to compare manager alphas.

I think there are some practical problems.

The ks.test will test if funds are different.
It doesn't really test if one fund is better
than the other.

For the data that you are likely to have, I
doubt you have much power.  I would try
simulating with some known distributions to
see how much power there is.
On 20/12/2010 21:04, Chiquoine, Ben wrote:
apply it to alphas generated by hedge fund managers. I have several years of
monthly excess returns for each manager and I'd like to see which come from
distributions that are not statistically different.  I have two questions
for the group.  The first question is whether the KS test is valid for two
returns series which are likely not iid?  I think I read that as long as the
difference in empirical distributions functions (ecdf) is iid from the true
distribution (which I don't know) the test is valid.  My second question is
more focused on R.  ks.test gives me the source code for the R function but
there are several calls to C code within the function.  I'm wondering if
there is any way to view the source for the C functions?  I've searched R
help for an answer to this less finance related question but only found one
post in which they said the source could be found in a file called ks.c.
Unfortunately
 I!
group can offer is greatly appreciated.
should go.