Testing technical indicators
On 2 June 2006 at 07:26, BBands wrote:
| I'll have a look for a copy--maybe Dirk still has one, but Crusher was not | ready for prime time. At version 0.0.4 it had not been seriously debugged | and I am sure that there were calc errors that had not been fixed yet. I had | planned for basic usability at 0.1.0, but we didn't get that far. If I can't | find it, I'll post some Python TA indicator code. But Crusher comes from the pre-Rmetrics days. I'd suspect that you find as much if not more code in the TA examples in Rmetrics. Most of what I contributed to Crusher was the Bollingerbands plotting function (now also on the excellent R Graph gallery) I wrote to convince John to drop the fugly gnuplot :) | For me it goes like this. I use R as a calculation engine rather than a | programming environment. So any time I have a calc that R seems like a | natural resource for, I use R. That include regressions, t tests, Chi | Square, etc... I've found no need to go to C or C++ as with a decent | computer and a modicum of memory R and Python are fast enough for my needs. I think Gabor once noted on one of the lists that he found that he, over time, converged to R for the other tasks previously done outside R. That's true for me as well. My very first exposure to S-Plus involved piping to it from Perl which talked to DBs etc pp. These days I rarely have to go outside of R --- other than to compiled code for performance reasons, and even then I try to glue that code back to R in order to control its rich environment. Dirk
Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something.
-- Thomas A. Edison