Garch problem
Dear Patrick, thank you so much for this reply. You said one solution is to increase the data point. However at this point I can not get more. Therefore if you please tell more about "doubtless other paths" I will be truly grateful. Regards,
Patrick Burns-2 wrote:
The fit is essentially saying that the half-life of a shock is infinite. This generally occurs when the in-sample volatility has a general trend. One solution is more data. There are doubtless other paths as well. RON70 wrote:
I have following dataset as monthly percentage return for a stock : 0.173741362 -0.062237174
[ ... ]
-0.001652893 -0.092301325 Now I fit a GARCH (1,1) model on that :
garch(Delt(dat)[-1], c(1,1))
***** ESTIMATION WITH ANALYTICAL GRADIENT *****
I INITIAL X(I) D(I)
1 4.331103e-03 1.000e+00
2 5.000000e-02 1.000e+00
3 5.000000e-02 1.000e+00
IT NF F RELDF PRELDF RELDX STPPAR D*STEP
NPRELDF
0 1 -4.507e+02
1 6 -4.508e+02 2.00e-04 3.20e-04 1.5e-03 6.3e+06 1.5e-04
1.01e+03
2 7 -4.508e+02 1.57e-05 1.69e-05 1.4e-03 2.0e+00 1.5e-04
3.19e-01
3 13 -4.521e+02 2.85e-03 4.72e-03 5.6e-01 2.0e+00 1.3e-01
3.16e-01
4 16 -4.602e+02 1.76e-02 4.41e-03 8.1e-01 6.7e-01 5.1e-01
1.99e-02
5 23 -4.607e+02 1.13e-03 2.77e-03 1.6e-04 7.4e+00 1.8e-04
8.48e+00
6 24 -4.607e+02 4.81e-05 4.37e-05 1.6e-04 2.0e+00 1.8e-04
1.77e+01
7 30 -4.638e+02 6.60e-03 8.81e-03 9.8e-02 2.0e+00 1.2e-01
1.84e+01
8 31 -4.645e+02 1.52e-03 7.73e-03 8.2e-02 1.3e+00 1.2e-01
1.39e-02
9 33 -4.688e+02 9.18e-03 6.28e-03 6.8e-02 0.0e+00 1.2e-01
6.94e-03
10 35 -4.693e+02 9.32e-04 9.33e-04 8.9e-03 1.9e+00 1.8e-02
2.86e-02
11 37 -4.699e+02 1.34e-03 1.59e-03 1.6e-02 1.8e+00 3.5e-02
5.99e-02
12 38 -4.704e+02 1.05e-03 1.43e-03 1.6e-02 1.6e+00 3.5e-02
9.10e-03
13 40 -4.705e+02 1.84e-04 2.85e-04 5.3e-03 1.2e+00 1.3e-02
7.52e-04
14 42 -4.705e+02 3.71e-05 5.18e-05 2.4e-03 8.1e-01 5.0e-03
7.09e-05
15 44 -4.705e+02 8.51e-07 3.04e-06 4.9e-04 8.2e-01 9.5e-04
5.29e-06
16 57 -4.705e+02 -7.73e-15 1.09e-15 5.0e-15 4.4e+06 9.1e-15
2.87e-07
***** FALSE CONVERGENCE *****
FUNCTION -4.704848e+02 RELDX 4.961e-15
FUNC. EVALS 57 GRAD. EVALS 16
PRELDF 1.088e-15 NPRELDF 2.867e-07
I FINAL X(I) D(I) G(I)
1 2.824235e-05 1.000e+00 5.619e+01
2 8.649332e-02 1.000e+00 -5.899e-01
3 9.175397e-01 1.000e+00 -6.866e-01
Call:
garch(x = Delt(dat)[-1], order = c(1, 1))
Coefficient(s):
a0 a1 b1
2.824e-05 8.649e-02 9.175e-01
Warning message:
In sqrt(pred$e) : NaNs produced
What we see that sum of alpha and beta coef is more than 1. Therefore
probably I choose a wrong model on my dataset. Can anyone please guide me
how to modify that model?
Regards,
_______________________________________________ R-SIG-Finance at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-finance -- Subscriber-posting only. -- If you want to post, subscribe first.
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Garch-problem-tp22556251p22573080.html Sent from the Rmetrics mailing list archive at Nabble.com.