returns convention
It seems to be common within academic literature - econometric and finance, though I'd not go so far as to rely on one definition across a range of applications. Probably should/could be, but unlikely to ever happen. Even my quantmod package isn't entirely consistent - as some functions are log diff and others simple percent changes - depending on use. Though I *think* it is documented where each is used. And as far as I can tell, my trading accounts don't change by log differences : ) Jeff
On 10/8/07, paul sorenson <sf at metrak.com> wrote:
Is it usually assumed that references to "returns" are calculated as diff(log(prices))? Compared with say the simple fractional change from one price to the next? For example, in PerformanceAnalytics I notice that the default value of CalculateReturns is diff(log(prices)). I guess it probably doesn't matter much either way for small changes, I just wanted to know if there was some common convention when I see an R function that expects a returns vector. cheers
_______________________________________________ R-SIG-Finance at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-finance -- Subscriber-posting only. -- If you want to post, subscribe first.