A question on VECM
ok ok I got it...........thank you so much John
RON70 wrote:
Thanks, I did following : n = 10 r = 4 beta = matrix(rnorm(10*4), 4) Q = beta[1:r, 1:r] P = solve(Q) beta.norm = P %*% beta # This is the normalized, according to you. Now how can I say "beta" and "beta.norm" are indeed equivalent? Regards, John C. Frain wrote:
Let beta be (r by n) of rank r. (r<n). Let Q (r by r) be the first r columns of this matrix. Let P = inv(Q). Then P * pi is of the form you require. (I presume that Q is always invertible - see Johansen(1995), Likelihood based inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models, Oxford.). In the early days this method was seen as one way of achieving identification of the model. Regrettably, in most cases, it does not have any economic content Best regards John 2009/6/4 RON70 <ron_michael70 at yahoo.com>:
Right now I am not interested on estimation however trying to convince myself to justify this statement "normalization is always possible if variables arranged properly". I am trying to answer "why and how it is always possible?" PS: we know that having information on C.I. matrix does not improve coef estimation as rate of convergence for C.I. coef are much faster than rest. Pfaff, Bernhard Dr. wrote:
Dear Ron, if I understand you correctly, you have a-priori knowledge about some of the CI-relations? If so, why don't you compute them in advance and then work further? This would also reduce the dimension of your VECM. Best, Bernhard ps: Incidentally, the returned list element 'beta' of cajorls is computed pretty much in sync what you have quoted, i.e., "normalization is always possible if variables arranged properly".
Von: r-sig-finance-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch [mailto:r-sig-finance-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch] Im Auftrag von RON70 Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. Juni 2009 11:30 An: r-sig-finance at stat.math.ethz.ch Betreff: Re: [R-SIG-Finance] [R-sig-finance] A question on VECM Thanks Bernhard for this reply. However actually I was thinking there might be some matrix property for any rxn (rank "r") matrix to equivalently explain in a combination of Identity and rx(n-r) matrices. Is it so? Actually I got this feeling from a statement saying that, "normalization is always possible if variables arranged properly". Therefore suppose I have some economic theory to express C.I. vectors in original term i.e. arbitrary C.I. matrix, based on some economics. Then I arrange them i.e. do matrix manipulation to make C.I. matrix Normalized i.e. let say, I have following original C.I. matrix (based on some economics) on 10 variables : n = 10 r = 4 C.I.matrix = matrix(rnorm(10*4), 4) Now I want to make it (I[4], C.I.matrix.modified[4x6] ) Here I am rather interested is there any R function to do this kind of "matrix-normalization", not so interested to get a "already normalized" C.I. matrix. Is there any? Thanks Pfaff, Bernhard Dr. wrote:
-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: r-sig-finance-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch [mailto:r-sig-finance-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch] Im Auftrag von RON70 Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. Juni 2009 10:19 An: r-sig-finance at stat.math.ethz.ch Betreff: [R-SIG-Finance] [R-sig-finance] A question on VECM In my textbook, I found that for a vector error correction model, the "beta" matrix i.e. which represents the co-integrating vectors can be represented in a speacial matrix wherein first rxr partition is Identity matrix like : beta[rxn] = (I(r), beta[rx(n-r)]) Is there any R function to do that representation?
Dear Ron? have you considered the CRAN package 'urca' and there the function cajorls()? library(urca) example(cajorls) Best, Bernhard
Regards, -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/A-question-on-VECM-tp23847406p23847406.html Sent from the Rmetrics mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________ R-SIG-Finance at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-finance -- Subscriber-posting only. -- If you want to post, subscribe first.
***************************************************************** Confidentiality Note: The information contained in this
...{{dropped:10}}
_______________________________________________ R-SIG-Finance at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-finance -- Subscriber-posting only. -- If you want to post, subscribe first.
-- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/A-question-on-VECM-tp23847406p23866615.html Sent from the Rmetrics mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________ R-SIG-Finance at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-finance -- Subscriber-posting only. -- If you want to post, subscribe first.
_______________________________________________ R-SIG-Finance at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-finance -- Subscriber-posting only. -- If you want to post, subscribe first.
-- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/A-question-on-VECM-tp23847406p23867519.html Sent from the Rmetrics mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________ R-SIG-Finance at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-finance -- Subscriber-posting only. -- If you want to post, subscribe first.
-- John C Frain, Ph.D. Trinity College Dublin Dublin 2 Ireland www.tcd.ie/Economics/staff/frainj/home.htm mailto:frainj at tcd.ie mailto:frainj at gmail.com
_______________________________________________ R-SIG-Finance at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-finance -- Subscriber-posting only. -- If you want to post, subscribe first.
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/A-question-on-VECM-tp23847406p23868632.html Sent from the Rmetrics mailing list archive at Nabble.com.