Starting value of conditional mean and variance
A few years ago, on the suggestion of Pat, I implemented an option which allows to choose whether to use all the data for the initialization of the variance recursion or some other value e.g. for exponential smoothing backast. This can be found in the fit.control option (of ugarchfit) under 'rec.init':
From the documentation:
"The rec.init option determines the type of initialization for the variance recursion. Valid options are ?all? which uses all the values for the unconditional variance calculation, an integer greater than or equal to 1 denoting the number of data points to use for the calculation, or a positive numeric value less than one which determines the weighting for use in an exponential smoothing backcast." This is only for the variance recursion initialization, and not the conditional mean. Best, Alexios
On 05/10/2015 01:49, Patrick Burns wrote:
I haven't studied the issue with ARIMA, but it is my belief that it is even less of an issue there. Maybe someone on the list has looked into it and has a better sense of the sensitivity -- rather than being like the rest of us and not worrying about it because no one else does. Pat On 05/10/2015 04:43, Samit Paul wrote:
Thanks a lot Pat,
I was more concerned about the second issue which you have pointed out
well. From the link given (thanks again for the same), I understand that
if the number of observations are more (around 2000), choice of starting
value won't matter much in conditional variance estimation by GARCH(1,1)
model.
But is the same logic applicable for conditional mean estimation with
the help of ARIMA model, too? Or do I have to take any precaution for
the same?
Best regards,
Samit Paul
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Patrick Burns <patrick at burns-stat.com
<mailto:patrick at burns-stat.com>> wrote:
I have two possible interpretations
of "starting values":
1) initial values of coefficients given
to the optimizer of the likelihood
2) the value of the conditional variance
at the time point before the first observation
If you are talking about the first, I
think you have little to worry about.
The default optimization in 'rugarch' is
reasonably good. But there are options
to use different optimizers if you want to
check the quality of the optimum.
If you are talking about the second, then
that won't be an issue as long as you have
enough observations to make estimating a
garch model useful. See:
http://www.portfolioprobe.com/2012/07/06/a-practical-introduction-to-garch-modeling/
Pat
On 04/10/2015 16:52, Samit Paul wrote:
Dear R users,
I am trying to estimate conditional mean and variance of a
financial return
series using UGARCHSPEC and UGARCHFIt function of "rugarch"
package. I am
trying to fit basic ARMA(1,1)-GARCH(1,1) with Student - t
distribution.
Now, I am not sure how the starting values are considered in
this case or
whether I need to set it manually. Since the starting value
is very
important for the estimation purpose, there could be some robust
method for
calculation of the same.
Any help in this regard will be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Samit Paul
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________
R-SIG-Finance at r-project.org <mailto:R-SIG-Finance at r-project.org>
mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-finance
-- Subscriber-posting only. If you want to post, subscribe
first.
-- Also note that this is not the r-help list where general R
questions should go.
--
Patrick Burns
patrick at burns-stat.com <mailto:patrick at burns-stat.com>
http://www.burns-stat.com
http://www.portfolioprobe.com/blog
twitter: @burnsstat @portfolioprobe