Skip to content
Prev 13504 / 15274 Next

Failure of solve.QP in portfolio modeling

One correction and another comment.

I should have said that a trade optimizer
not caring about positive definiteness is
usually a bad thing -- it has its uses
but giving the optimizer a shot at a
portfolio with negative variance is asking
for trouble (because it will do its best
to get there).

The estimates of the variance with only a
few observations are going to be extremely
noisy.  I think the length of history to
be used to estimate the variance should
depend on what length gives the best variance
estimate and should be independent of the
rebalancing schedule.  (Though perhaps I
have misinterpreted the original post.)

Pat
On 22/09/2015 19:59, Patrick Burns wrote: