Skip to content
Prev 2603 / 15274 Next

robust portfolio optimization

I pretty much understand all of the solutions
that have been offered.  What I don't understand
is the original question.

How do you know if your solution is
good or not?  Given that you have two years of data
and you are talking about samples of one year, a
reasonable plan would be to test an out-of-sample
period (a day, a week, ...) and then move the in-sample
data that amount.  Only a year of out-of-sample data
seems rather short to me.

You want to get good returns.  I think it is safe to say
that the amount of predictive power in a year of daily
returns is infinitesimal, no matter how much fancy footwork
you do.  A test of optimization technology without a good
predictive model for returns is going to be driven by noise
unless you are creating minimum variance portfolios (or
some other minimum risk).


Patrick Burns
patrick at burns-stat.com
+44 (0)20 8525 0696
http://www.burns-stat.com
(home of S Poetry and "A Guide for the Unwilling S User")
Enrico Schumann wrote: