On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Joshua Ulrich <josh.m.ulrich at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Amod, On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Amod Karve (????) <karve.amod at gmail.com> wrote:
I ran into a bug when trying to use time.in.force in ruleOrderProc. When specifying a numeric value for time.in.force, I was getting an error in ruleOrderProc when calling: tif <- as.Date(tif.xts) I think the problem is that the underlying tif.xts is a zoo object and as.Date() fails on it. When I removed the as.Date(), the backtest ran fine. What's the process for patching in bug fixes?
Thanks for the feedback. The best way to contribute a patch is to create a minimal strategy that allows us to reproduce the issue you see, along with your patch. That will allow us to verify the issue, and evaluate your patch. Once you have that, please open an issue on the TradeAnalytics tracker on R-Forge: https://r-forge.r-project.org/tracker/?group_id=316
I've tracked this down and it should be fixed in r1712.
Thanks
amod
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________ R-SIG-Finance at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-finance -- Subscriber-posting only. If you want to post, subscribe first. -- Also note that this is not the r-help list where general R questions should go.
-- Joshua Ulrich | about.me/joshuaulrich FOSS Trading | www.fosstrading.com
Joshua Ulrich | about.me/joshuaulrich FOSS Trading | www.fosstrading.com