Skip to content

Non parametric, unequal variance, equality of mean significance test

7 messages · Reena Bansal, Brian G. Peterson, Moshe Olshansky +1 more

#
Reena Bansal wrote:
I seriously doubt your series are long enough for any standard 
statistical test to have high enough confidence.  Your error bands will 
be quite wide.

I would probably check the fit to non-normal and fat-tailed 
distributions such as the Cornish Fisher, the skewed Student-t and the 
general Pareto.  If your data seems to fit those well, you may be able 
to compare the fitted distributions.

There are a number of distribution fitting functions in 
PerformanceAnalytics, and most have been wrapped into chart.Histogram 
and chart.QQPlot.  Of course, R has a wealth of this kind of 
functionality, and I'm only referring to the code I am most familiar with.

Regards,

     - Brian
#
Hi Reena,

There is Cramer's theorem stating that the sum of two independent variables has normal distribution if and only if each of them is normally distributed. So to strictly satisfy conditions for t-test you data must be normally distributed.
However, because of the Central Limit Theorem, if the sample is large enough (and has finite second moment/variance) you can use t-test (with unequal variances). I believe that 30 and 20 may be large enough.
As to Mann Whitney test, it checks for equal distributions - equal means are not enough.

Best regards,
Moshe.
--- On Thu, 24/12/09, Reena Bansal <Reena.Bansal at moorecap.com> wrote:

            
4 days later