Hi!
I nearly didn't open this email thread: glad I did!
I have some odd R tools for weaving, but nothing for beading.
I suspect this is the best way to do it, although the actual result
would depend on the particular pattern.
http://www.bellaonline.com/articles/art61406.asp
Whether it's worth writing R code to perform this task depends a lot
on how many patterns need to be converted.
A more R-geo approach might be to import the original pattern from an
image file, turn it into spatial polygons, then rasterize it,
completely ignoring the hexagonal nature of the original. With some
playing with the raster grid size, you could probably get a decent
approximation.
Sarah
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 10:40 AM, chris english
<englishchristophera at gmail.com> wrote:
Thank you Ben!, I'll actually send her directly
to Sarah, http://www.sarahgoslee.com/ .
Dr. Massa, meet Dr. Goslee, Professor of indeterminate studies & weaver,
and writer,
Dr. Goslee, meet Dr. Massa, cognitive neuro research scientist, felter
loom beader.
Thanks again,
Chris
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 9:12 AM, Ben Tupper <btupper at bigelow.org> wrote:
If I were in your shoes I would be doing a hop-skip to ring Sarah
doorbell. She's our resident ecology-spatial-textiles guru...
http://www.stringpage.com/
On Jul 29, 2018, at 12:26 AM, chris english <
englishchristophera at gmail.com>
wrote:
My wife showed me a beading pattern that she was working on that looks
my eye like a hexagonal grid, its called a peyote stitch, and she needs
transform it to a loom stitch, essentially a raster. In the beading
they suggest combining two rows into one. If asked, what have you
would say I tried to duck, but... In practical application, the two rows
equals one doesn't appear to preserve the desired pattern when beading
loom, probably something like netting out the half-steps when you're
from two rows to one = n+1 or n +2 for bead count on the combined row.
40x40 hex grid, OK, I'll get out my graph paper. Summer.
Thank you for your forbearance, and any very general thoughts
ie transforms sans datums & etc.
Chris