Skip to content
Prev 24248 / 29559 Next

How to reduce the buffering time with the function "buffer" (package raster)

And this is for a raster with around 5 milliion cells? Your results
surprise me a bit, especially if the bottleneck is at the call to
buffer()/distance().  Your best bet is to wait for a response from Robert
Hijmans or someone else working on the package, they might have some other
tricks up their sleeves. In any case, I agree, 5+ hours is extremely
excessive.

Sincerely,
Forrest
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 6:57 PM Nelly Reduan <nell.redu at hotmail.fr> wrote:

            
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-geo/attachments/20160412/22c1a547/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Capture.PNG
Type: image/png
Size: 12209 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-geo/attachments/20160412/22c1a547/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Capture.PNG
Type: image/png
Size: 12209 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-geo/attachments/20160412/22c1a547/attachment-0001.png>
Message-ID: <CAEBQMMmDZXP7K+6U8AAYrb5BOpPaVuc5_GSF9cQrdA8RciGDkA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CY1PR0501MB1772661FD5CC5C18111F3DB999940@CY1PR0501MB1772.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>