rgdal compile confusion [RESOLVED]
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018, Shaun Walbridge wrote:
It looks like the maintainer of the slackbuild recently downgraded GDAL back to the 2.2.4 version because of the problems with the 2.3.0 release: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__git.slackbuilds.org_slackbuilds_commit_gis_gdal-3Fh-3D14.2-26id-3Dc97bd17ac886c33fb90b3954945e2c3b07907acc&d=DwIGaQ&c=n6-cguzQvX_tUIrZOS_4Og&r=nxHWzsbFn4X_N0ruafqevZE4LSBsSvWC_0wkjR1NVTY&m=ATemW5xbQSNOMLNPRJ7Qhs2z8VgsMWup3KQpGwj65HU&s=V_lu-cvt5T7I-SaxG-5K3zvdqiCDT8vQ-VDgV0r4_Ak&e=
I'd recommend you reinstall the newest (2.2.4) slackbuild version of the package, and try rebuilding rgdal while using that.
Shaun, How interesting. I did not see that notice on the SBo mail list and David did not point me to it when I wrote him about the problem. Yes, gdal-2.2.4 supports the building of rgdal-1.3-4. The compatibilty problem must be subtle as configure finds C++11 on my system yet does not build the latest gdal or rgdal. Thanks very much, Rich