Skip to content
Prev 7848 / 29559 Next

writeOGR issue in dbf

I believe that this is part of the DBF specification (there is also a
limit on the number of characters in a variable name. 12?). This was
largely ignored by ArcView (and the versions of excel that write dbf
files), but apparently not by ArcGIS (apart from the missing warning
message, that is probably a good thing). Perhaps a future version of
readOGR could check for and fix variable names that are not DBF
compliant when writing shp files?
Robert

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Wayne Richter
<wxrichte at gw.dec.state.ny.us> wrote: