Skip to content
Prev 16742 / 29559 Next

Question about the results of mixed lagsarlm

Good, please post your question on the list after checking all the 
references, for example for lm.morantest, lm.morantest.sad and 
lm.LMtests; lm.moantest.exact is covered in Bivand, Roger; M?ller, 
Werner G.; Reder, Markus. Power calculations for global and local 
Moran's l. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 2009 ;Volum 53.(8) 
s. 2859-2872. The Tiefelsdorf 2002 reference is very relevant, as are 
works cited there. In general, normality is not a real issue, unless the 
shape of the residuals is very badly behaved, but you can always run 
some simulations.

Roger
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012, Marcio Pupin Mello wrote:
> Dear Prof. Roger,
 >    thanks for your reply.
 >    I've just sent a new post to the list and it worked now.
 >    I haven't read the papers where tests were introduced. Would them 
be those ones you cited in the help for summary.sarlm {spdep}? But I 
read in LeSage and Pace (2009) that a CI for the estimated parameters 
could be found through simulation processes.
 >    Apparently, results of the summary.sarlm showed that the test for 
the Intercept is Z based (Gaussian assumption, though), but I am not 
sure about the LR and Wald tests for Rho as well as LM test for residual 
autocorrelation.
 >    Bests,
 >
 > Marcio
 > www.dsr.inpe.br/~mello
 >
 > LeSage, J. and Pace, R.K. Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. CRC 
Press: Boca Raton, USA, 2009. 354 p.
On 12/22/11 1:21 PM, Roger Bivand wrote: