Skip to content
Prev 27664 / 29559 Next

Alternate statistical test to linear regression?

Note that the normality assumptions are about the residuals (or about
y conditional on x), not on the x variable(s) or all of y
(non-conditional).  If x is highly skewed and the residuals are normal
then diagnostics just on y will also show skewness (if there is a
relationship between x and y).

Also, the normality assumptions are about the tests and confidence
intervals, the least squares fit is legitimate (but possibly not the
most interesting fit) whether the residuals are normal or not.  The
Central Limit Theorem also applies in regression, so if the residuals
are non-normal, but you have a large sample size then the tests and
intervals will still be approximately correct (with the quality of the
approximation depending on the degree of non-normality and sample
size).

There are many alternative tools.  There is a task view on CRAN for
Robust Statistical Methods that gives summaries of many packages and
tools for robust regression (and other things as well) which does not
depend on the normality assumptions.


On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 9:21 AM rain1290--- via R-sig-Geo
<r-sig-geo at r-project.org> wrote: