Message-ID: <CAKkiGbtXYQ7fMDPMC+gVi9m+9XVBtQdTnE3jHSTv3=5zO3Fh4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: 2019-03-15T14:17:35Z
From: Vijay Lulla
Subject: [FORGED] Re: Aggregating points based on distance
In-Reply-To: <CAA=SVwEn7UBHCTnL=VxUc-LjXC3ZKA4je4wP0Upyzj1dJ1L4_g@mail.gmail.com>
+1 from me too for Rolf's nomination!
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 6:43 PM Dexter Locke <dexter.locke at gmail.com> wrote:
> FWIW: I agree with Rolfs nomination.
>
> +1
>
> -Dexter
> http://dexterlocke.com
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 5:30 PM Rolf Turner <r.turner at auckland.ac.nz>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On 14/03/19 7:33 AM, Barry Rowlingson wrote:
> >
> > <SNIP>
> >
> > > The problem with "modern" syntax is that it's subject to rapid change
> > > and often slower than using base R, which has had years to stabilise
> > > and optimise.
> >
> > <SNIP>
> >
> > Fortune nomination.
> >
> > cheers,
> >
> > Rolf
> >
> > --
> > Honorary Research Fellow
> > Department of Statistics
> > University of Auckland
> > Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > R-sig-Geo mailing list
> > R-sig-Geo at r-project.org
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo
> >
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-sig-Geo mailing list
> R-sig-Geo at r-project.org
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]