Skip to content
Prev 2726 / 29559 Next

centering explanatory variables around spatial lag

List,

When the influence of explanatory variables "spills over" into adjacent or
proximate spatial units, one way to model this would be to include a spatially
lagged explanatory variable (WX). If there exists a significant spatially lagged
association, then (it would seem to me) the influence of X would be biased if it
is correlated with WX (which it would be if X was non_randomly distributed in
space). In other words, the effect of X is confounded with WX if the two are
correlated AND both have independent impacts on the outcome.  It would seem that
a properly specified model would include both the effects of X and WX.  One
potential problem is that X and WX maybe highly correlated leading to
instability in the estimation of their independent effects.  It seems a
solution, analogous to what is often done in multi-level models, is to center X
on its spatial average, WX.  Thus,

yhat = b0 + b1(X - WX) + b2(WX).

where the influence of WX is now a function of two parameters: (b2-b1)WX and the
null H0:b2-b1 = 0

Is there a reason not to do this with spatially lagged explanatory variables? 
Is there any literature on this?  I have an empirical example in which the
results from centering versus non centering differ dramatically, so I want to
make sure that the situation is analogous to the multi-level case before
proceeding.  I could do some simulation, but I thought I would ask the list first.



thanks!



Sam