Skip to content
Prev 6585 / 29559 Next

how to test for effect of spatial scale

Dear Maurizio -

it sounds as though your data are what my spatial stats teacher called
"lattice" data.

The particular analysis you propose - repeatedly aggregating different
blocks of data together and then comparing across scales; sounds like
the "grieg-smith" approach to testing for spatial randomness; and the
"two term local quadrat variance (TTLQV)" approach for identifying
patches.

For more a general background on lattice (aka areal) data, try chapter
9 in Bivand et al (2009) Applied spatial data analysis with R and
section 2.6 in Fortin and Dale (2005) Spatial Analysis: A guide for
Ecologists.

It may also be that the spatially explicit nature of your data is a
red herring in this case and what you're really after is something
like rarefaction or bootstrapping.

Cheers,

Anna
Dr. Anna E.  Marburg

Postdoctoral researcher
Ecosystem Processes Team
Landcare Research
P O Box 40
Lincoln 7640
NEW ZEALAND

phone + 64  3 321 9729
MarbugA at landcareresearch.co.nz




Please consider the environment before printing this email
Warning:  This electronic message together with any attachments is confidential. If you receive it in error: (i) you must not read, use, disclose, copy or retain it; (ii) please contact the sender immediately by reply email and then delete the emails.
The views expressed in this email may not be those of Landcare Research New Zealand Limited. http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz
Message-ID: <4550E4F1-3DBC-4983-937D-877A09763607@landcareresearch.co.nz>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.15.1254564003.24339.r-sig-geo@stat.math.ethz.ch>