Skip to content
Prev 20099 / 29559 Next

a spatial bestiary?

On Fri, 27 Dec 2013, Agus Camacho wrote:

            
Please refer to the resources mentioned in:

https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-geo/2013-December/020127.html

in a different thread. Because spatial data can be approached from 
different disciplinary and professional starting points, such as:

@techreport{herring11,
    author = {John R. Herring},
    title = {{OpenGIS\textregistered} Implementation Standard for 
Geographic information - Simple feature access - Part 1: Common 
architecture},
    institution = {Open Geospatial Consortium Inc.},
    number = {1.2.1, OGC 06-103r4},
    year = {2011}
}

or

@incollection{kresseetal:12,
   author = {Wolfgang Kresse and David M. Danko and Kian Fadaie},
   title = {Standardization},
   year = {2012},
   editor = {Wolfgang Kresse and David M. Danko},
   booktitle = {Springer Handbook of Geographic Information},
   publisher = {Springer},
   address = {Berlin Heidelberg},
   pages = {393--565}
}

it isn't obvious which end of the beast to examine first, tail, hoof, 
ears? At base this is a question about reference ontologies and support, 
so "a point" is very rarely just a numeric vector of length two or three, 
really. The sp classes don't even try to touch positional measurement 
error, for example, nor the data collection protocolls implicit in the 
given "position". It is hard to get the classes clear, and then methods 
require more again. The materials in the link are as far as we've got.

Roger