Skip to content
Prev 26360 / 29559 Next

[DKIM] Re: Interpolating snowfall values on a Digital Elevation Model [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Some thoughts.
On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 at 09:09 Li Jin <Jin.Li at ga.gov.au> wrote:

            
Any such advice is completely dependent on the study area, and the goals of
the study. UTM is really bad advice generally, it's just a simplistic
system we've inherited and is used way too much, a self-fulfilling
prophecy. Whether standard tools should or shouldn't accept data as given
is a crux philosophical point, no tool in R is smart enough to know whether
it's "correct enough" to assume one way or another. You can't assume any
measurement represents reality in any projection, it depends how far, how
much, how large - you can't traverse from local neighbourhood scales to
continental, for example - you'd make different choices regarding
compromises at *some such point*.

Please don't ever advise use of UTM without specific caveats about the
scope and extent of the research - which is impossible in general - learn
to use map projections with the compromises they entail, there's nothing
stopping creating a local new one, from any of the main families with
PROJ.4, and with many variants of compromises on area, length, shape and
scale.

I tend not to say anything about this topic in this environment, but this
time the back and forth is particularly misleading IMO.

We actually have the worst of worlds at the moment, with many softwares
opinionatedly preventing one from making educational mistakes. There's no
real authority, lots of opinion and habit. lots of exploration but not
enough pushing and argument - I advise keeping an open mind and exploring
deeply.

Cheers, Mike.