How to reduce the buffering time with the function "buffer" (package raster)

Five million cells isn't all that many, how slow is too slow? Buffering a
raster of about 10 million cells on my laptop takes on the order of 20
seconds or so for a binary raster. Is it possible that you're fighting
memory problems?

In the past when doing multiple ring buffers I've found it faster to
calculate a distance-to raster first, and then apply multiple logical
comparisons on the distance raster.  I don't know if this applies to your
situation or not but it's one trick that might help.

Sincerely,
Forrest

Hello,


I would like to build 100-m buffers (representing ecological corridors)
around land cover attributes in a raster layer and to assign a given value
(i.e., value of 13) to buffer cells.


To do this, I'm using the function "buffer" (package raster) to draw the
buffers around particular raster cells (i.e., cell values of 2 and 5). For
example, in the image below, the buffers are represented in blue (cell
values of 13) and the particular raster cells are represented in yellow
(cell values of 2).


The problem is that the time to run the function "buffer" is very low
because I have a raster of 5000000 cells. Does anyone know how I can reduce
the buffering time ?


Thanks a lot for your time.

Have a nice day.

Nell

[image: Capture.PNG]

_______________________________________________
R-sig-Geo mailing list
R-sig-Geo at r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-geo/attachments/20160411/159ec27b/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Capture.PNG
Type: image/png
Size: 12209 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-geo/attachments/20160411/159ec27b/attachment.png>