1. Re: default value for cutoff in gstat variogram()
john lewis wrote:
Hello all, I did a comparison of gstat, geoR and SPlus 6.1 about 2 years ago with the coal ash data and found little difference among them after a bit of time making sure all input parameters were the same. I don't know if I can find those results but maybe it is time for me to do it again?
Maybe they're not worrying from a statistical point of view, but from the point of view of code verification I am interested to see them (with the data & scripts to generated them). The coalash data are only available in S-Plus, am I right? (We do have an S+SpatialStats licence, but never got around to set it up for 7.0) -- Edzer