Skip to content

RasterLayerSparse?

1 message · Jonathan Greenberg

#
Hi Nevil (cc'ing r-sig-geo):

How are they sparse, exactly?  Is this something where you could be
using a vector-like format instead (x,y,category time 1, category time
2), etc?  It might be looking towards the spacetime data models for
some inspiration, since they have a lot of different sparse and
semi-sparse formats.

I'm not quite following why a compressed format wouldn't work in terms
of storage space -- raster, and the functions like getValueBlock (for
instance) don't care what raster format the files are in -- in your
example, those 160 layers could be MUCH smaller (on disk) if they are
truly sparse (lots of 0s or similar values), and still provide the
read/write capabilities just like an uncompressed TIFF would.

--j
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 3:37 AM, nevil amos <nevil.amos at gmail.com> wrote: