Skip to content

RE : Mass conversions of Lat/Long to UTM (many zone)

2 messages · Philippe Roy, Roger Bivand

#
-----Message d'origine-----
De?: Roger Bivand [mailto:Roger.Bivand at nhh.no] 
Envoy??: 24 ao?t 2006 15:28
??: Philippe Roy
Cc?: r-sig-geo at stat.math.ethz.ch
Objet?: Re: [R-sig-Geo] Mass conversions of Lat/Long to UTM (many zone)
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006, Philippe Roy wrote:

            
If you want to use all the stations together, then they must be in the 
same zone (otherwise the western edge of the zone will jump for stations 
in different zones). I think that for continental North America a central 
UTM zone will not be a very good idea, and that probably a Lambert 
Azimuthal Equal Area is a better choice.

You can then use project() or spTransform() in the rgdal package, for 
example, with EPSG code 2163:

US National Atlas Equal Area

+proj=laea +lat_0=45 +lon_0=-100 +x_0=0 +y_0=0 +a=6370997 +b=6370997 +units=m

with some modification of +lat_0 and +lon_0 to suit your region.

  
    
#
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006, Philippe Roy wrote:
"Ok, so, in my kriging code, I need to specify a maximum distance in km
(or meter can't remember).  Is this Lambert Azimuthal Equal Area good for
Euclidian distance?  I mean, I need to specify the maximum distance to
consider a station or not for each grid point of my regular grid.  Would
that be good then?

Sorry if it sounds non-understandable! :/ "

(and using an HTML mailer - please do not, it makes thread management very 
difficult!)

Have you tried? (Hint: the metric is meters/metres). Yes, you can give a
maximum distance, otherwise the 2300 by 2300 martix of distances between
stations is unnecessarily large (and it is unlikely that interactions
across the whole region are strong).