Skip to content

redundancy of coordinates of pixels

3 messages · Robert J. Hijmans, Komine

#
Hi,
I have in a matrix 1 255 153 rows and corresponding to the coordinates of
burned pixels on 10 years. The coordinates are in UTM. I want to know the
pixels burned several times on the 10 years. However, less 1% of my pixels
were burned on the 10 years. It seems false. My code uses the center of
pixels, in this case, a same area can burn several times in the 10 years,
but because the center of pixels differ little one year to another, the code
will not show correctly me the pixels which burn each year. Because the code
required that the pixels have EXACTELY the same cordinates.  
Do you known a solution with R to resolve this problem?  
My Code:
Sorry for my bad English!
Thank you in advance 


--
View this message in context: http://r-sig-geo.2731867.n2.nabble.com/redundancy-of-coordinates-of-pixels-tp7169408p7169408.html
Sent from the R-sig-geo mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
2 days later
#
Hi everybody
Thank Robert for your help. 
I rounded the coordinates but the problem persists. However, I don?t
understand well the second suggestion (certainly problem of language). 
I thought to affect a number for each pixel and in this case, the problem
with the coordinates would be suppressed. Unfortunately, if I do it, the
problem will persist because almost all the coordinates are different.  
Note: Original data was handled with GIS software and I compute with R. 
Thanks for your help


--
View this message in context: http://r-sig-geo.2731867.n2.nabble.com/redundancy-of-coordinates-of-pixels-tp7169408p7180082.html
Sent from the R-sig-geo mailing list archive at Nabble.com.