parallel random number generators
On 18 May 2009 at 18:02, A.J. Rossini wrote:
| On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:14 AM, Ross Boylan <ross at biostat.ucsf.edu> wrote:
| > I notice snow defaults to using rlecuyer rather than rsprng. Should I | > take this as a sign that the former is "better" in some sense? | | Yes. SPRNG's theoretical properties seem to be poorer from a | theoretic sense than the STREAMS algorthim, at least from my readings, | but there is also the problem that SPRNG is abandonmentware. There is a sprng4 release but I never got it built. It also changed the API, so not sure how hard it would be to update rsprng. Dirk
Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions.