Skip to content
Prev 13055 / 15075 Next

Homebrew

Arguments against homebrew:

Not an official response, but in the past, homebrew was compiling everything on the local machine. This is not the case anymore, and the default installation in homebrew, installs a binary. 

All packages need to be installed from source. This takes time, but I had no problems with any of the packages I use.

Just some tidbits from previous discussions.

But I would like to also hear the official reason (no resources would be a good enough justification as well).

Arguments for homebrew: 

it is more Linux like, in the way that you have more control over the tools used. e.g. when still using the official R installation, I regularly used different versions of GDAL in R, GRASS, ?, which can cause inconsistencies.

The installation is done without requiring root privileges, which is a big advantage (as I see it).



Cheers,

Rainer
--
Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation Biology, UCT), Dipl. Phys. (Germany)

Orcid ID: 0000-0002-7490-0066

Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies
University of Z?rich
Office Y34-J-74
Winterthurerstrasse 190
8075 Z?rich
Switzerland

Office:	+41 (0)44 635 47 64
Cell:       	+41 (0)78 630 66 57
email:      Rainer.Krug at uzh.ch
		Rainer at krugs.de
Skype:     RMkrug

PGP: 0x0F52F982