packages failed to load - Now fixed
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Tom Hopper <tomhopper at gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 15:23, Simon Urbanek <simon.urbanek at r-project.org>wrote:
On May 25, 2011, at 7:17 AM, Tom Hopper wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:50, Prof Brian Ripley <ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2011, Tom Hopper wrote: Brian,
Since the problem was fixed by updating packages with checkBuilt=T, wouldn't installing packages fresh using the script have avoided the problem?
No, because it checks if they are already installed *as I said*.
Sorry, my question was poorly structured. I understood your original statement, and was following up with regards to the update process of R
for
Mac and some of its inner workings. Since I don't have your knowledge of
the
software, and am unlikely to develop such knowledge in the foreseeable future, I (perhaps incorrectly) addressed my question to you. I take it from your response that the problem that Ian Reeve encountered
is
due to an unresolved bug in R and that there was nothing that could have been done to get the packages to correctly install when moving from 2.12
to
2.13.0, short of including checkBuilt=T.
No, you got it completely backwards! The script you referred to is useless in that case (and I told you that you are entirely off topic with that!), it has nothing to do with R. There is no "bug" in R mentioned anywhere in the thread, so you are really inventing things here. Please *do* read the e-mails you are receiving.
Ignoring the personal attack, I'd like to get back to the thread, and my question. Having read through the thread a couple of times, my understanding is that Ian Reeve updated R for Mac using the installer, then installed all of the packages he wanted from CRAN. As I understand the thread, after this update, an old package compiled under 2.12 was, inexplicably, located in his 2.13 library. That it was a package problem and not something else was confirmed by resolving the problem with update.packages(checkBuilt=T), rather than the other methods suggested. It seems to me that either the R installer did not update correctly, perhaps by retaining a link to the 2.12 directory, or Ian accidentally copied a package over rather than reinstalling everything fresh from CRAN. I believe that you, Simon, suggested the latter as a possibility. I refer to the former possibility as a "bug," because, to the best of my knowledge, it should happen and shouldn't be possible. Use other terminology, if you like. Ian then asked if he should delete the old directory before performing an upgrade, to which you responded that doing so shouldn't be necessary, and we should just "install new R and then use Package Manager to install packages." As I understood this, it means a file was accidentally copied over when it shouldn't have been, so the fix is to install packages directly from CRAN using the Package Manager, a script or some other method, just so long as there's no copying. Alternatively, copying must be followed by update.packages(checkBuilt=T). Now, I'm sure that I have this wrong, someplace, and since I update multiple computers on multiple platforms, without your expertise in R, I'm trying to understand this well enough so that I can avoid similar problems. If I install a new version of R and then, without doing anything else, either use the Package Manager or a script to install the packages I want, would I encounter the same problem?
You should not. Sean
Thanks, Simon
Perhaps section 2.8 of the Windows FAQ should be incorporated into the
Mac
FAQ? The checkBuilt trick is otherwise not brought to our attention. The FAQ could also be clearer on whether recommended packages can be replaced with older versions using this method; it's much easier to copy-and-paste everything in the directory than to hunt-and-peck for
only
the packages that aren't installed by default. I'll submit that
suggestion
to R-windows at r-project.org separately. - Tom On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 07:58, Prof Brian Ripley <
ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
wrote:
It's really odd that people blog about their own inefficient scripts
rather than read the R documentation. Because this scripts checks (very inefficiently) if a package is
already
installed, it would not solve the problem discussed in this thread.
?And
install.packages() takes a vector of packages, and 'survival' is a recommended package and should always be installed. Because people have differing needs there are different ways to do
this.
But the ideas of
suit many. On Wed, 25 May 2011, Tom Hopper wrote: There's a handy script to automate the update process that I came
across
some time ago at
When you run the script, it will automatically install the libraries that you set up in the script. When you run it, it will install into the first location in .libPaths(). If you want packages installed in ~/Library/R..., then you need to check the "Default Library Paths" option in R-->Preferences-->Startup. Alternatively, you could supply the lib= argument to the install.packages() call. With a little extra code, you could
even
define the install location for each package individually. Here's a shortened version: # Essential R packages: 2011-01-02 # Originally from: R packages I use commonly: 12/21/2010 twitter: drbridgewater # ? ? Jeff S. A. Bridgewater #
#
#list all packages currently installed
p<-c()
#add essential packages:
p<-c(p,"survival")
p<-c(p,"Hmisc")
# add more packages here
# UPDATE the repository list to point to your local repositories
repositories<-c("http://mirrors.softliste.de/cran/","
http://mirrors.softliste.de/cran/")
install_package<-function(pack,repositories)
{
if(!(pack %in% row.names(installed.packages())))
{
update.packages(repos=repositories, ask=F)
install.packages(pack, repos=repositories, dependencies=T)
}
require(pack,character.only=TRUE)
}
for( pack in p)
{
install_package(pack,repositories)
}
? ? ?[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________ R-SIG-Mac mailing list R-SIG-Mac at r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac --
Brian D. Ripley, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk Professor of Applied Statistics, ?http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, ? ? ? ? ? ? Tel: ?+44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UK ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Fax: ?+44 1865 272595
? ? ? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________ R-SIG-Mac mailing list R-SIG-Mac at r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac
-- Brian D. Ripley, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk Professor of Applied Statistics, ?http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, ? ? ? ? ? ? Tel: ?+44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UK ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Fax: ?+44 1865 272595
? ? ? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________ R-SIG-Mac mailing list R-SIG-Mac at r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac
? ? ? ?[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________ R-SIG-Mac mailing list R-SIG-Mac at r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac