Message-ID: <878ys0bzrv.fsf@jeeves.blindglobe.net>
Date: 2003-06-17T15:30:20Z
From: A.J. Rossini
Subject: R version on gifi
In-Reply-To: <DEDDCB6E-A0BF-11D7-B39E-000393816814@math.uni-augsburg.de> (Simon Urbanek's message of "Tue, 17 Jun 2003 14:33:16 +0200")
Simon Urbanek <Simon.Urbanek@math.uni-augsburg.de> writes:
> On Monday, June 16, 2003, at 08:45 PM, Don MacQueen wrote:
>> Can you give specific and substantive reasons why fink should be
>> avoided?
>
> Jan already listed the main technical reasons why it is indeed a very
> good idea. Apart from that, fink is not an official package and was
> only meant as a temporary solution for people who need a (no matter
> how ugly) way to run existing unix programs on OS X. Hardly any real
> OS X user has installed fink (especially since Jaguar is out). Fink
> was great during the first couple of months when native OS X ports
> were hardly existent, but is now obsolete for mainstream OS X use.
I think completely agree with Simon here. MacOSX is great for folks
that like the good things in life, but for chumps who just want a Unix
variant, run a PPC Unix (linux or *bsd or the like). There are just
enough differences to create user-interface stress, depending on the
particular system configuration...
(of course, I'm one of those who has been using a unix variant for
almost 20 years now, and with the onset of senility, that isn't going
to change).
best,
-tony
--
A.J. Rossini / rossini@u.washington.edu / rossini@scharp.org
http://software.biostat.washington.edu/ UNTIL IT MOVES IN JULY.
Biomedical and Health Informatics, University of Washington
Biostatistics, HVTN/SCHARP, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
FHCRC: 206-667-7025 (fax=4812)|Voicemail is pretty sketchy/use Email
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachments ... {{dropped}}