Herv?,
what Brian was referring to was
[1] "mac.binary"
Cheers,
Simon
On 2/04/2020, at 10:20 PM, Herv? Pag?s <hpages at fredhutch.org> wrote:
On 4/2/20 02:05, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On 02/04/2020 09:34, Simon Urbanek wrote:
Herv?,
"both" is a fairly recent addition and my guess would be that it has been guarded specifically since it is the default and installing binaries only works for the CRAN version. I didn't look at the new "both" code to see how it knows that it's the CRAN version - there is really no special "CRAN" flag. At some point we were guarding binary installs in general by checking the OS and R, but it was fragile - you could be building using the same system as we do and yet use a different compiler, so I think it's in general impossible unless we introduce some extra identification of the binaries. So, yes, if you compile R from sources yourself it is not guaranteed to be compatible with CRAN package binaries. Those are only built and tested with the CRAN R binary.
It is simple: type = 'both' has to know what the two types are. Only the CRAN binaries have the default type set to "mac.binary": building from the sources gives you a default type of "source". See ?.Platform.
AFAIK the CRAN binary has the default type set to "both".
Anyway knowing the defaults is interesting but only orthogonal to the discussion.
H.
On 2/04/2020, at 7:47 PM, Herv? Pag?s <hpages at fredhutch.org> wrote:
Hi Simon,
After installing R 4.0 alpha from source on a macOS Mojave system, R won't let me use type="both" to install CRAN packages. I get:
Error in install.packages("rJava", type = "both", repos = "https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__cran.r-2Dproject.org&d=DwIDaQ&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=BK7q3XeAvimeWdGbWY_wJYbW0WYiZvSXAJJKaaPhzWA&m=MSzgfKtoxGL_KkQlwrc2_nVNhirnKTu8bSZjbK7pWfo&s=dwNIQLeXMIf8EpV1P4Y7_Dy14ehDLhEXXodGF8S4pu8&e= ") :
type == "both" can only be used on Windows or a CRAN build for macOS
OK so this suggests that the CRAN binary packages for R 4.0 are not compatible with my R. Surprisingly though using type="mac.binary" doesn't complain and lets me install these binaries. But then trying to load them causes segfaults. I've tried this with rJava, Rcpp, ggplot2, and doing library() on any of them crashes my session. Note that installing all these packages from source works without any problem.
So my questions are: is it the case that CRAN binary packages are not meant to be used with an R 4.0 installed from source? If yes then why isn't type="mac.binary" blocking this like type="both" does?
Thanks,
H.
R version 4.0.0 alpha (2020-04-01 r78132)
Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin18.7.0 (64-bit)
Running under: macOS Mojave 10.14.6
Matrix products: default
BLAS: /Users/biocbuild/bbs-3.11-bioc/R/lib/libRblas.dylib
LAPACK: /Users/biocbuild/bbs-3.11-bioc/R/lib/libRlapack.dylib
locale:
[1] en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8
attached base packages:
[1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base
loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
[1] compiler_4.0.0
--
Herv? Pag?s
Program in Computational Biology
Division of Public Health Sciences
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
1100 Fairview Ave. N, M1-B514
P.O. Box 19024
Seattle, WA 98109-1024
E-mail: hpages at fredhutch.org
Phone: (206) 667-5791
Fax: (206) 667-1319