Hi, I have an R-Tcl/Tk application and I do most of my testing on Windows and Linux, but I am presenting a workshop soon for which participants will need to install the software on their own laptops beforehand, and I may get some installation questions from MacOS X users. I was just hoping to check on this list whether the strategy I used to install my R package and its requirements on MacOS X last year (with R 1.7.0) is still appropriate for 1.9.x. My main question is this: Does the latest R for MacOS X work better with X11 Tcl/Tk than Aqua Tcl/Tk? Or, put another way, is one easier to install than the other? From memory, X11 was preferred for 1.7.0 (the last R for OS X version I tried). My R-Tcl/Tk package requires the BWidget and TkTable extensions. BWidget contains only Tcl scripts (no shared libraries/compiled code) so it is very easy to install, but TkTable has a compiled shared library, so it is very important that users know whether they have an Aqua version (e.g. from TclTkAquaBI) or an X11 version. I have built an X11 version at: http://bioinf.wehi.edu.au/limmaGUI/Tktable2.8MacOSX_X11.zip Best regards, James
R-Tcl/Tk on MacOS X
3 messages · Jan de Leeuw, James Wettenhall
The official R-1.9.x for OS X from CRAN or Stefano's site requires the X11 version of Tcl/Tk. So you have X11 widgets in your Tcl/Tk windows, while R is running in R.app. You cannot get Quartz graphics from Terminal.app or Emacs.app. My unofficial R-devel on http://gifi.stat.ucla.edu/pub uses Aqua Tcl/Tk. It uses a rather nasty hack to provide Quartz from Terminal.app and Emacs.app. You cannot use packages such as tkrplot, which depends explicitly on X11s. It also implies that if you have a package that loads a shared library into Tcl/Tk, then that shared library should be a dynamic library and not a bundle (that's the way Aqua Tcl/Tk is set up). It does not work well with R running in R.app. So, on balance, I think you should go with the official X11 version and live with the ugliness until R-core fixes the eventloop problem.
On Jun 29, 2004, at 3:50, James Wettenhall wrote:
Hi, I have an R-Tcl/Tk application and I do most of my testing on Windows and Linux, but I am presenting a workshop soon for which participants will need to install the software on their own laptops beforehand, and I may get some installation questions from MacOS X users. I was just hoping to check on this list whether the strategy I used to install my R package and its requirements on MacOS X last year (with R 1.7.0) is still appropriate for 1.9.x. My main question is this: Does the latest R for MacOS X work better with X11 Tcl/Tk than Aqua Tcl/Tk? Or, put another way, is one easier to install than the other? From memory, X11 was preferred for 1.7.0 (the last R for OS X version I tried). My R-Tcl/Tk package requires the BWidget and TkTable extensions. BWidget contains only Tcl scripts (no shared libraries/compiled code) so it is very easy to install, but TkTable has a compiled shared library, so it is very important that users know whether they have an Aqua version (e.g. from TclTkAquaBI) or an X11 version. I have built an X11 version at: http://bioinf.wehi.edu.au/limmaGUI/Tktable2.8MacOSX_X11.zip Best regards, James
_______________________________________________ R-SIG-Mac mailing list R-SIG-Mac@stat.math.ethz.ch https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac
=== Jan de Leeuw; Professor and Chair, UCLA Department of Statistics; Editor: Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Journal of Statistical Software US mail: 8130 Math Sciences Bldg, Box 951554, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1554 phone (310)-825-9550; fax (310)-206-5658; email: deleeuw@stat.ucla.edu homepage: http://gifi.stat.ucla.edu ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------- No matter where you go, there you are. --- Buckaroo Banzai http://gifi.stat.ucla.edu/sounds/nomatter.au
Jan, Thanks-very much for your reply. I'll definitely advise MacOS X participants in our microarray workshop to use X11 Tcl/Tk, i.e. I'll tell them NOT TO install the Tktable extension from TclTkAquaBI, but to instead INSTALL IT FROM http://bioinf.wehi.edu.au/limmaGUI/ My R-Tcl/Tk GUI does use tkrplot quite a lot, so it is limited to X11 at the moment, but I will add an option soon, so that the user can choose between tkrplot and the regular R graphics device for all plots. One thing I have in my tkrplot windows is a File menu with options to save the plot as PNG, JPEG, PDF etc. Rgui in Windows provides this automatically when using the regular R graphics device. On Linux/X11, things are a bit more complicated because of the difference between png() and bitmap(). png() should work as long as you have a valid DISPLAY for X11, but I seem to remember having problems at some stage with my R-Tcl/Tk GUI with png() on Linux/X11 so I switched to bitmap(), which creates PNGs indirectly via ghostscript, so they don't looks as good, but they can be created without an X11 DISPLAY. (But then how could I have been running R-Tcl/Tk without a valid X11 DISPLAY???) I suppose on MacOS X, png() etc. should always work. I've just asked my administrator to install R 1.9.1 on a Mac, so I guess I'll soon find out how this issue (of being able to easily save PNGs etc.) compares between tkrplot and the regular graphics device for my R-Tcl/Tk GUI running in R 1.9.1 on MacOS X. Regards, James