Hello, All: ????? "update.packages()" fails for me on packages DescTools, digest, jpeg, mgcv, openxlsx, rlang, and spam.? It first says: ? There are binary versions available but the ? source versions are later: ?????????? binary? source needs_compilation DescTools 0.99.29 0.99.30????????????? TRUE digest???? 0.6.21? 0.6.22????????????? TRUE jpeg??????? 0.1-8 0.1-8.1????????????? TRUE mgcv?????? 1.8-29? 1.8-30????????????? TRUE openxlsx? 4.1.0.1?? 4.1.2????????????? TRUE rlang?????? 0.4.0?? 0.4.1????????????? TRUE spam??????? 2.3-0 2.3-0.2????????????? TRUE ????? It then asks, "Do you want to install from sources the packages which need compilation? (Yes/no/cancel)".? I reply "y" or "Yes".? For each package, it says it was ... successfully unpacked and MD5 sums checked ** using staged installation ** libs xcrun: error: invalid active developer path (/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools), missing xcrun at: /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/bin/xcrun ERROR: compilation failed for package ?DescTools? * removing ?/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/3.6/Resources/library/DescTools? * restoring previous ?/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/3.6/Resources/library/DescTools? ????? A web search for "xcrun: error: invalid active developer path" identified a couple of discussions on StackExchange that say that I need to have Xcode installed correctly.? I think I have everything up to date:? macOS 10.15.1 Catalina with Xcode downloaded and installed via the App store.? RStudio 1.2.5001 with: sessionInfo() R version 3.6.1 (2019-07-05) Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0 (64-bit) Running under: macOS Catalina 10.15.1 Matrix products: default BLAS: /System/Library/Frameworks/Accelerate.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/vecLib.framework/Versions/A/libBLAS.dylib LAPACK: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/3.6/Resources/lib/libRlapack.dylib locale: [1] en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8 attached base packages: [1] stats???? graphics? grDevices utils???? datasets [6] methods?? base loaded via a namespace (and not attached): [1] compiler_3.6.1 tools_3.6.1 "https://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/254380/why-am-i-getting-an-invalid-active-developer-path-when-attempting-to-use-git-a" recommends, "xcode-select --install", which to me seems like it should be equivalent to the install I just did via the App Store. This StackExchange discussion also said, "If the above alone doesn't do it, then also run:? xcode-select --reset".? However, before I do that, I thought I'd ask here if anyone else is having a problem like this.? And if yes, and if they've fixed it, what did they do to fix it? ????? Thanks, ????? Spencer Graves
update.packages() cannot install from source
4 messages · Spencer Graves, Balamuta, James Joseph, Dr Eberhard W Lisse
Greetings and Salutations,
Note that Xcode Command Line Tools is not the same as Xcode IDE. In fact, only Xcode CLI Tools are required, which are light-weight compared to the IDE.
Regarding your error, this is symptomatic of an Xcode update tied to an OS point-release. Note in the session information 10.15.1 (the .1 being the bump)
R version 3.6.1 (2019-07-05)
Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0 (64-bit)
Running under: macOS Catalina 10.15.1
Both of the commands highlighted are accurate. Though, the order should be changed to:
sudo xcode-select --reset
sudo xcode-select --install
The reset changes back to using the default command line tools path. This was needed for Mojave.
Sincerely,
JJB
?On 10/29/19, 4:01 PM, "R-SIG-Mac on behalf of Spencer Graves" <r-sig-mac-bounces at r-project.org on behalf of spencer.graves at prodsyse.com> wrote:
Hello, All:
"update.packages()" fails for me on packages DescTools, digest,
jpeg, mgcv, openxlsx, rlang, and spam. It first says:
There are binary versions available but the
source versions are later:
binary source needs_compilation
DescTools 0.99.29 0.99.30 TRUE
digest 0.6.21 0.6.22 TRUE
jpeg 0.1-8 0.1-8.1 TRUE
mgcv 1.8-29 1.8-30 TRUE
openxlsx 4.1.0.1 4.1.2 TRUE
rlang 0.4.0 0.4.1 TRUE
spam 2.3-0 2.3-0.2 TRUE
It then asks, "Do you want to install from sources the packages
which need compilation? (Yes/no/cancel)". I reply "y" or "Yes". For
each package, it says it was
... successfully unpacked and MD5 sums checked
** using staged installation
** libs
xcrun: error: invalid active developer path
(/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools), missing xcrun at:
/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/bin/xcrun
ERROR: compilation failed for package ?DescTools?
* removing
?/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/3.6/Resources/library/DescTools?
* restoring previous
?/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/3.6/Resources/library/DescTools?
A web search for "xcrun: error: invalid active developer path"
identified a couple of discussions on StackExchange that say that I need
to have Xcode installed correctly. I think I have everything up to
date: macOS 10.15.1 Catalina with Xcode downloaded and installed via
the App store. RStudio 1.2.5001 with:
sessionInfo()
R version 3.6.1 (2019-07-05)
Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0 (64-bit)
Running under: macOS Catalina 10.15.1
Matrix products: default
BLAS:
/System/Library/Frameworks/Accelerate.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/vecLib.framework/Versions/A/libBLAS.dylib
LAPACK:
/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/3.6/Resources/lib/libRlapack.dylib
locale:
[1] en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8
attached base packages:
[1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets
[6] methods base
loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
[1] compiler_3.6.1 tools_3.6.1
"https://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/254380/why-am-i-getting-an-invalid-active-developer-path-when-attempting-to-use-git-a"
recommends, "xcode-select --install", which to me seems like it should
be equivalent to the install I just did via the App Store. This
StackExchange discussion also said, "If the above alone doesn't do it,
then also run: xcode-select --reset". However, before I do that, I
thought I'd ask here if anyone else is having a problem like this. And
if yes, and if they've fixed it, what did they do to fix it?
Thanks,
Spencer Graves
_______________________________________________
R-SIG-Mac mailing list
R-SIG-Mac at r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac
The xcode-select ?install is required after upgrading to Catalina. I have several machines so I usually only need to figure out once what Apple has done this time :-)-O. Once I know that, the other machines usually go without a hitch. And after a while one settles in and doesn?t even notice Apple being Nanny any longer. But I still write it into my handbook so next version I can remember :-)-O I usually do homebrew first and when that works the other stuff usually compiles as well. Or you can run make if that works, xcode-cli is installed properly. el ? Sent from Dr Lisse?s iPhone Xs
On 29 Oct 2019, 23:13 +0200, Balamuta, James Joseph <balamut2 at illinois.edu>, wrote:
Greetings and Salutations, Note that Xcode Command Line Tools is not the same as Xcode IDE. In fact, only Xcode CLI Tools are required, which are light-weight compared to the IDE. Regarding your error, this is symptomatic of an Xcode update tied to an OS point-release. Note in the session information 10.15.1 (the .1 being the bump) R version 3.6.1 (2019-07-05) Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0 (64-bit) Running under: macOS Catalina 10.15.1 Both of the commands highlighted are accurate. Though, the order should be changed to: sudo xcode-select --reset sudo xcode-select --install The reset changes back to using the default command line tools path. This was needed for Mojave. Sincerely, JJB On 10/29/19, 4:01 PM, "R-SIG-Mac on behalf of Spencer Graves" <r-sig-mac-bounces at r-project.org on behalf of spencer.graves at prodsyse.com> wrote: Hello, All: "update.packages()" fails for me on packages DescTools, digest, jpeg, mgcv, openxlsx, rlang, and spam. It first says: There are binary versions available but the source versions are later: binary source needs_compilation DescTools 0.99.29 0.99.30 TRUE digest 0.6.21 0.6.22 TRUE jpeg 0.1-8 0.1-8.1 TRUE mgcv 1.8-29 1.8-30 TRUE openxlsx 4.1.0.1 4.1.2 TRUE rlang 0.4.0 0.4.1 TRUE spam 2.3-0 2.3-0.2 TRUE It then asks, "Do you want to install from sources the packages which need compilation? (Yes/no/cancel)". I reply "y" or "Yes". For each package, it says it was ... successfully unpacked and MD5 sums checked ** using staged installation ** libs xcrun: error: invalid active developer path (/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools), missing xcrun at: /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/bin/xcrun ERROR: compilation failed for package ?DescTools? * removing ?/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/3.6/Resources/library/DescTools? * restoring previous ?/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/3.6/Resources/library/DescTools? A web search for "xcrun: error: invalid active developer path" identified a couple of discussions on StackExchange that say that I need to have Xcode installed correctly. I think I have everything up to date: macOS 10.15.1 Catalina with Xcode downloaded and installed via the App store. RStudio 1.2.5001 with: sessionInfo() R version 3.6.1 (2019-07-05) Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0 (64-bit) Running under: macOS Catalina 10.15.1 Matrix products: default BLAS: /System/Library/Frameworks/Accelerate.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/vecLib.framework/Versions/A/libBLAS.dylib LAPACK: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/3.6/Resources/lib/libRlapack.dylib locale: [1] en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8 attached base packages: [1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets [6] methods base loaded via a namespace (and not attached): [1] compiler_3.6.1 tools_3.6.1 "https://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/254380/why-am-i-getting-an-invalid-active-developer-path-when-attempting-to-use-git-a" recommends, "xcode-select --install", which to me seems like it should be equivalent to the install I just did via the App Store. This StackExchange discussion also said, "If the above alone doesn't do it, then also run: xcode-select --reset". However, before I do that, I thought I'd ask here if anyone else is having a problem like this. And if yes, and if they've fixed it, what did they do to fix it? Thanks, Spencer Graves
_______________________________________________ R-SIG-Mac mailing list R-SIG-Mac at r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac _______________________________________________ R-SIG-Mac mailing list R-SIG-Mac at r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac
????? Thanks to James Joseph Balamuta and Eberhard W. Lisse.? I followed the 2-step procedure outlined by Balamuta, and it fixed the problem for all but the jpeg package.? I will write the maintainer of that package.? (The one-step would probably have worked, but I didn't try it.) ????? Thanks again, ????? Spencer Graves
On 2019-10-29 16:12, Balamuta, James Joseph wrote:
Greetings and Salutations,
Note that Xcode Command Line Tools is not the same as Xcode IDE. In fact, only Xcode CLI Tools are required, which are light-weight compared to the IDE.
Regarding your error, this is symptomatic of an Xcode update tied to an OS point-release. Note in the session information 10.15.1 (the .1 being the bump)
R version 3.6.1 (2019-07-05)
Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0 (64-bit)
Running under: macOS Catalina 10.15.1
Both of the commands highlighted are accurate. Though, the order should be changed to:
sudo xcode-select --reset
sudo xcode-select --install
The reset changes back to using the default command line tools path. This was needed for Mojave.
Sincerely,
JJB
?On 10/29/19, 4:01 PM, "R-SIG-Mac on behalf of Spencer Graves" <r-sig-mac-bounces at r-project.org on behalf of spencer.graves at prodsyse.com> wrote:
Hello, All:
"update.packages()" fails for me on packages DescTools, digest,
jpeg, mgcv, openxlsx, rlang, and spam. It first says:
There are binary versions available but the
source versions are later:
binary source needs_compilation
DescTools 0.99.29 0.99.30 TRUE
digest 0.6.21 0.6.22 TRUE
jpeg 0.1-8 0.1-8.1 TRUE
mgcv 1.8-29 1.8-30 TRUE
openxlsx 4.1.0.1 4.1.2 TRUE
rlang 0.4.0 0.4.1 TRUE
spam 2.3-0 2.3-0.2 TRUE
It then asks, "Do you want to install from sources the packages
which need compilation? (Yes/no/cancel)". I reply "y" or "Yes". For
each package, it says it was
... successfully unpacked and MD5 sums checked
** using staged installation
** libs
xcrun: error: invalid active developer path
(/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools), missing xcrun at:
/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/bin/xcrun
ERROR: compilation failed for package ?DescTools?
* removing
?/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/3.6/Resources/library/DescTools?
* restoring previous
?/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/3.6/Resources/library/DescTools?
A web search for "xcrun: error: invalid active developer path"
identified a couple of discussions on StackExchange that say that I need
to have Xcode installed correctly. I think I have everything up to
date: macOS 10.15.1 Catalina with Xcode downloaded and installed via
the App store. RStudio 1.2.5001 with:
sessionInfo()
R version 3.6.1 (2019-07-05)
Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0 (64-bit)
Running under: macOS Catalina 10.15.1
Matrix products: default
BLAS:
/System/Library/Frameworks/Accelerate.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/vecLib.framework/Versions/A/libBLAS.dylib
LAPACK:
/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/3.6/Resources/lib/libRlapack.dylib
locale:
[1] en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8
attached base packages:
[1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets
[6] methods base
loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
[1] compiler_3.6.1 tools_3.6.1
"https://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/254380/why-am-i-getting-an-invalid-active-developer-path-when-attempting-to-use-git-a"
recommends, "xcode-select --install", which to me seems like it should
be equivalent to the install I just did via the App Store. This
StackExchange discussion also said, "If the above alone doesn't do it,
then also run: xcode-select --reset". However, before I do that, I
thought I'd ask here if anyone else is having a problem like this. And
if yes, and if they've fixed it, what did they do to fix it?
Thanks,
Spencer Graves
_______________________________________________
R-SIG-Mac mailing list
R-SIG-Mac at r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac