Skip to content

problem with eigen() ??

3 messages · Paul Rathouz, Don MacQueen, Thomas Lumley

#
Hi All -- I am running a dual processor G4 with R v 1.6.2 for X11 which I
installed from fink.  Look what the eigen() function produces.  Am I
thinking about this wrong, or should  all of the eigen values be 1? -- pr

-----------------------------
[,1] [,2] [,3]
[1,]    1    0    0
[2,]    0    1    0
[3,]    0    0    1
[,1] [,2] [,3] [,4]
[1,]    1    0    0    0
[2,]    0    1    0    0
[3,]    0    0    1    0
[4,]    0    0    0    1
[,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5]
[1,]    1    0    0    0    0
[2,]    0    1    0    0    0
[3,]    0    0    1    0    0
[4,]    0    0    0    1    0
[5,]    0    0    0    0    1
[1] 1 1 1 1 0
[1] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0
[1] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0
[1] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[1] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
[1] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[1] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0
-----------------------------

==========================================================================
Paul Rathouz, Asst. Professor        ph   773-834-1970
Dept. of Health Studies, Rm. W-264   fax  773-702-1979
University of Chicago                prathouz@health.bsd.uchicago.edu
5841 S. Maryland Ave. MC 2007
Chicago, IL  60637
#
Whether or not this is a Mac issue, I would suggest upgrading R to 1.8.0.

-Don
[1] 1 1 1 1 1
_                       
platform powerpc-apple-darwin6.7.5
arch     powerpc                 
os       darwin6.7.5             
system   powerpc, darwin6.7.5    
status   Patched                 
major    1                       
minor    8.0                     
year     2003                    
month    10                      
day      13                      
language R
At 10:12 AM -0500 10/17/03, Paul Rathouz wrote:

  
    
#
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Paul Rathouz wrote:

            
They should be 1, and if you were using more recent version of R they
would be. I seem to recall that there were a number of problems with
getting linear algebra code linked in properly back then.

	-thomas