[R-meta] Compiling different design in the same met-analysis
Thanks Gerta for such a simple and important reminder. Apart from having test for subgroup differences, which other advantage can have doing a subgroup analysis (with the moderator in meta-regression) vs separate meta-analyses? Just assuming that is a categorical moderator
On 04/05/2021 11:25, Gerta Ruecker wrote:
Hi Gladys, Note that separate meta-analyses is not the same as subgroup analysis. If you do a subgroup analysis (in the Cochrane sense), you have design as a moderator and obtain a treatment-design interaction test, which you don't get if conducing separate analyses. Therefore I would prefer to present all in one. Best, Gerta Am 04.05.2021 um 11:17 schrieb Gladys Barragan-Jason:
Hi all, Thanks a lot for your responses. Actually, I did not specify it before but I am using the rma.mv <http://rma.mv> function since I can have several estimates from several studies of the same lab? (random=~1|lab/study/estid). Following your recommendations, I checked whether the type of design had a significant effect on effect sizes and actually it didn't except for one specific type of intervention in which I do not have that much data:? 3 papers for each design containing 7 and 4 effect sizes respectively. In this case, meta-analysis of overall estimates is non-significant while when computing them separately, one is significant (control vs. treatment groups) while the other is not (pre- vs. post treatment). I do think that would make sense to present the overall meta-analysis as well as the two designs separately?? In any case, we would need more data to conclude?for sure. Best, Gladys Le?lun. 3 mai 2021 ??20:18, Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP) <wolfgang.viechtbauer at maastrichtuniversity.nl <mailto:wolfgang.viechtbauer at maastrichtuniversity.nl>> a ?crit?: Agree, but I also want to point to this: https://www.metafor-project.org/doku.php/tips:computing_adjusted_effects <https://www.metafor-project.org/doku.php/tips:computing_adjusted_effects> It discusses the concept of computing adjusted effects, which may be what you are looking for, Gladys. However, as noted at the end, some may question the usefulness and interpretability of such an estimate. Best, Wolfgang
>-----Original Message-----
>From: R-sig-meta-analysis
[mailto:r-sig-meta-analysis-bounces at r-project.org
<mailto:r-sig-meta-analysis-bounces at r-project.org>] On
>Behalf Of Dr. Gerta R?cker
>Sent: Monday, 03 May, 2021 20:09
>To: Gladys Barragan-Jason
>Cc: R meta
>Subject: Re: [R-meta] Compiling different design in the same
met-analysis
>
>Hi Gladys,
>
>You may pool all effects in a meta-analysis, using "design" as a
>moderator. In meta-analysis, this is called a subgroup analysis (for
>example by Cochrane). You then get both within-subgroup effects and a
>pooled effect, and also a test of treatment--design interaction, that
>says whether the treatment effect is different between designs.
Thus you
>have all what you are interested in. However, in your
interpretation you
>have to account for the different character of the studies: In a
>two-group parallel design, if it is randomized (you did not mention
>whether it is), you can expect an unbiased estimate of the treatment
>effect. In a pre-post design, you must expect all kinds of biases (to
>mention only regression to the mean) and also, as Michael said,
>different variation. Therefore you have to interpret results with
caution.
>
>Best, Gerta
>
>Am 03.05.2021 um 19:42 schrieb Gladys Barragan-Jason:
>> Hi Gerta and Michael,
>> I am not sure to understand. I am not saying the the effect
size are
>> different. They are comparable but of course differ in term of ci
>> since the number of studies, participants are different. I
would like
>> to know whether we can make obtain an overall effect size while
>> controlling for design. So maybe the answer is no.
>> Thanks
>> Gladys
-- ------------------------------------------ Gladys Barragan-Jason, PhD. ?Website <https://sites.google.com/view/gladysbarraganjason/home> Station d'Ecologie Th?orique et Exp?rimentale (SETE) CNRS de Moulis image.pngimage.png
_______________________________________________ R-sig-meta-analysis mailing list R-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-meta-analysis
Kind regards *Philippe Tadger* [[alternative HTML version deleted]]