Message-ID: <c08ac75048a54bb2be0fd6d554df0cbe@uniklinik-freiburg.de>
Date: 2023-12-20T18:26:56Z
From: Dr. Gerta Rücker
Subject: [R-meta] using netmeta::netsplit()
In-Reply-To: <CAK-DBaCqAcmPNS77+JVjrnqvsA6VNaiaaJbGtLbWRkse_Sx7CQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Dale,
I don't know the answer to your question (perhaps Guido has an idea), but there is a different way to (hopefully) shorten your output. By
> forest(ns1, only.reference = TRUE)
you see the results only for comparisons with the reference treatment.
Best,
Gerta
UNIVERSIT?TSKLINIKUM FREIBURG
Institute for Medical Biometry and Statistics
Dr. Gerta R?cker
Guest Scientist
Stefan-Meier-Stra?e 26 ? 79104 Freiburg
gerta.ruecker at uniklinik-freiburg.de
https://www.uniklinik-freiburg.de/imbi-en/employees.html?imbiuser=ruecker
-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Dale Steele via R-sig-meta-analysis <r-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org>
Gesendet: Samstag, 16. Dezember 2023 00:29
An: r-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org
Cc: Dale Steele <dale.w.steele at gmail.com>
Betreff: [R-meta] using netmeta::netsplit()
I'm doing a network meta-analysis, using netmeta (v2.9-0). There are a
large number
of potential comparisons in my network.
My current plot displays all comparisons (too many) where
least one study contributes direct evidence.
ns1 <- netsplit(net1)
forest(ns1, show = "both")
My goal is to produce a forest plot showing only comparisons for which there
are at least 3 studies with direct evidence.
I think I want the 7 comparisons where k > 2
> which(ns1$k > 2)
[1] 120 127 130 132 147 237 253
Thanks!
--Dale
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________
R-sig-meta-analysis mailing list @ R-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org
To manage your subscription to this mailing list, go to:
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-meta-analysis