-----Original Message-----
From: Luke Martinez [mailto:martinezlukerm at gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 10 January, 2022 13:38
To: Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP)
Cc: R meta
Subject: Re: Estimating "overall effect" in meta-regression
Dear Wolfgang,
The studies follow a pre-post-control design. The effect size measure used is
standardized mean difference (SMD).
I hope this clarifies my question.
Luke
sudy time? yi
1? ? ? ? ?0
1? ? ? ? ?1
2? ? ? ? ?0
2? ? ? ? ?1
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022, 5:43 AM Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP)
<wolfgang.viechtbauer at maastrichtuniversity.nl> wrote:
Dear Luke,
I don't understand the question, in part because it is not clear to me what kind
of design the studies have and what kind of effect size measure you are using.
Could you clarify this?
Best,
Wolfgang
-----Original Message-----
From: Luke Martinez [mailto:martinezlukerm at gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, 09 January, 2022 7:53
To: R meta
Cc: Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP)
Subject: Estimating "overall effect" in meta-regression
Dear R-meta Community,
I'm meta-analyzing a group of pre-post studies. My first RQ is: what
is the "overall effect" of policy X on a dependent variable.
I know that I can fit an intercept-only model to answer this RQ.
But an intercept-only model estimates the average effect size across
BOTH pre-tests (before policy X implementation) and post-tests (after
policy X implementation), while pre-test effect sizes don't contain
any policy X effect.
Given that, is it appropriate to use an intercept-only model to answer
this RQ, or I actually need to use a time indicator as a moderator to
separate the pre- from post-test effect sizes to answer this RQ (in
which case the original RQ must change too)?
Thank you for helping me better conceptualize this basic question,
Luke