-----Original Message-----
From: R-sig-meta-analysis [mailto:r-sig-meta-analysis-bounces at r-project.org] On
Behalf Of Michael Dewey via R-sig-meta-analysis
Sent: Wednesday, 05 July, 2023 14:10
To: Gabriel Cotlier; Yefeng Yang
Cc: Michael Dewey; R Special Interest Group for Meta-Analysis
Subject: Re: [R-meta] Question on funnel plot interpretation
Dear Gabriel
Before you continue searching for small study effects I think a search
for possible moderators of the effects would be more worthwhile. If you
believe that the purpose of meta-analysis is to synthesise then the
spread of values you have calls that goal into question. If you believ
that the purpose of meta-analysis is to understand why effects differ
then searching for possible moderators must be more helpful than looking
for small study efects.
Michael
On 05/07/2023 12:31, Gabriel Cotlier wrote:
Ok, so in my case would it be better? to use for instance?either inverse
n or alternatively?variance,? is this correct?
Regarding the high variability in the range of my Fisher's z transformed
values you noticed before.
This variability could be due to the fact that the values come
from?different?geographies, use of varied treatments?and
different?methods?as well?
Is there a quantitative?measure or way that can help to give account of
such variability or explain?it?
Thanks a lot again for your advice and guidance.
Kind regards,
Gabriel