Skip to content
Prev 2823 / 5632 Next

[R-meta] clubSandwich: Computing covariance matrix for autoregressive effects

Dear James,

Thank you for your response. I must clarify what I mean by "time" here.

In our dataset below (NEW_data), we have 3 senses of time.

(1) The column titled "time_wk" represents the time interval between each
post-test and the last treatment in each study in weeks.
(2) The column titled "time_cat" represents the categorized (1, 2, 3, 4)
version of "time_wk".
(3) The column titled "post_id"   represents the index of each post test
(1, 2, 3, 4). [note: this column doesn't necessarily match "time_cat"]

We don't have a "pre-test indicator" because the effect sizes we are
computing are obtained by obtaining the pre-post standardized mean change
for each specific time interval (e.g., pre to post 1) in each treatment
group and then subtracting pre-post standardized mean change for the
corresponding interval in the control/comparison group from that.

Indeed, the time interval between each post-test and the last treatment in
used each study is so variable across the studies that focusing on effects
at each time point seemed not very reasonable.

I hope I have described our effect sizes clearly, but basically "pre-test"
is involved in all our effect sizes. So, can we, in any way, benefit from
an "ar1" structure in ***impute_covariance_matrix()*** given our coding of
"time"?


Indeed, can we generally think of "time" in the traditional longitudinal
sense or we should use "post_id" when modeling our meta-analysis using
metafor::rma.mv()?

Sorry for the long message, please see our datset below.
Fred
---------- HERE IS OUR DATASET with 3 senses of "time":
NEW_data <- read.csv("https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ilzl/i/master/z2.csv
")
On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 8:37 AM James Pustejovsky <jepusto at gmail.com> wrote: