[R-meta] N of trials or participants?
Il 31/01/2023 21:51, Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (NP)wrote:
Dear Patrizio, I don't really understand your question. With 'standardized effect sizes estimation', do you mean the calculation of an effect size like a standardized mean difference? If so, that is done for a trial/study, so how would the number of trials ever be relevant for this?
Yes, I mean a standardized mean difference or a difference between proportions. In many studies, participants' results are based on a different number of trials. Patrizio Subject: [R-meta] N of trials or participants? When and how is it possible to use N of trials instead of N of participants in the standardized effect sizes estimation? It is likely that this question already had a response. In this case, please send me links or references. Thanks
Patrizio E. Tressoldi Ph.D. Science of Consciousness Research Group Studium Patavinum Universit? di Padova Padova - ITALY http://www.patriziotressoldi.it https://socrg.org https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6404-0058 https://opensciences.org/about/manifesto-for-a-post-materialist-science Make war history supporthttps://en.emergency.it [[alternative HTML version deleted]]