Skip to content
Prev 2206 / 5636 Next

[R-meta] Include a study with point estimate and 95% CI into a meta-anlaysis for incidence rates

Dear Thao,

Could you please properly register yourself on this mailing list? This was now the 4th post of yours that had to manually approved by the mailing list admins and this is creating extra work for us.

If the authors used Poisson regression (assuming a log link, which is the default), then this would be identical to computing the CI based on the log(rate) and then exponentiating. The use of robust variance estimation though implies that the SE used for constructing the CI is not the one we would construct based on theory, so this introduces a bit of an inconsistency. Ignoring this for now, the SE of a log(rate) is sqrt(1/numer_of_cases). We know the rate per 1000py (19.6) and the corresponding CI (16.2 to 23.6), so if we assume 5.5 * 1000py, we then get roughly the same CI:

round(exp(log(19.6) + c(-1,1) * qnorm(.975) * sqrt(1/(19.6*5.5))), 2)

(this gives 16.23 to 23.67 -- you can play around with the 5.5 a bit more to see if you can find a better approximation).

So, this implies 19.6 * 5.5 = 107.8 =~ 108 cases in 5500 person-years.

I don't know if these numbers are realistic based on how the study was conducted (that's a rather high number of PYs compared to the other studies), but this is what the CI implies.

Best,
Wolfgang