Skip to content
Prev 3750 / 5636 Next

[R-meta] correlational meta-analyses and Egger's regression test

Hi Catia,

I don't know of any studies on this. But the statistical theory here is
pretty straight-forward, so perhaps it's not necessary to do simulations to
confirm.

For the sample Pearson correlation coefficient r, the (estimated) standard
error is (1 - r^2) / sqrt(N - 1), which is strongly correlated with the
point estimator. This implies that there will tend to be an asymmetric
funnel plot and non-zero slope to Egger's regression (or the
multi-level/multi-variate extensions thereof) even in the absence of
selective reporting. To avoid this artifact, Wolfgang suggests using
1 / sqrt(N - 1) as the predictor in Egger's regression because then it will
be independent of the effect size estimator. Alternately, you could do the
analysis using Fisher's z transformation. The z transformed correlation has
standard error 1 / sqrt(N - 3), which will be independent of the effect
size estimator.

James

On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 11:53 AM C?tia Margarida Oliveira <
catiamargarid at gmail.com> wrote: