[R-meta] Does QE statistic in rma.mv() account for random effects as well?
Thank you for your response. On Fri, Jan 21, 2022, 6:39 AM Lukasz Stasielowicz <
lukasz.stasielowicz at uni-osnabrueck.de> wrote:
Dear Simon, if you compare the output of a simple fixed effect model to a simple random effects model then you can see that the QE value is the same. A reproducible example: library(metafor) rma(data=dat.bangertdrowns2004,yi,vi,mods=~length,method="FE") rma(data=dat.bangertdrowns2004,yi,vi,mods=~length,method="REML") "Test for Residual Heterogeneity: QE(df = 44) = 96.2810, p-val < .0001" In other words. Random effects do not influence the QE value. You can also see it in the code that Wolfgang provides via github: https://github.com/cran/metafor/blob/master/R/rma.mv.r (line 1500) For some conceptual clarifications see also this paper: Pastor, D. A., & Lazowski, R. A. (2017). On the multilevel nature of meta-analysis: A tutorial, comparison of software programs, and discussion of analytic choices. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 52(6), 789?804. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2017.1365684 Best, Lukasz -- Lukasz Stasielowicz Osnabr?ck University Institute for Psychology Research methods, psychological assessment, and evaluation Seminarstra?e 20 49074 Osnabr?ck (Germany) Am 21.01.2022 um 12:00 schrieb r-sig-meta-analysis-request at r-project.org:
Send R-sig-meta-analysis mailing list submissions to
r-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-meta-analysis or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to r-sig-meta-analysis-request at r-project.org You can reach the person managing the list at r-sig-meta-analysis-owner at r-project.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of R-sig-meta-analysis digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Does QE statistic in rma.mv() account for random effects as well? (Simon Harmel) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 21:01:56 -0600 From: Simon Harmel <sim.harmel at gmail.com> To: R meta <r-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org> Subject: [R-meta] Does QE statistic in rma.mv() account for random effects as well? Message-ID: <CACgv6yX9xozyJV5Nbd+dmh75UYjaGjXKwCk=
Q3T_084jpNA1hg at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Dear Meta-Analysis Experts, I'm running a multilevel model with metafor's rma.mv(). Does the QE statistic (Test for Residual Heterogeneity) reported by
rma.mv(),
in addition to the variance explained by moderators, also account for the variance components explained by random-effects (Sigmas, Taus, & Gammas)? In other words, a significant QE in such models suggests that the true effects are heterogeneous beyond what has been explained by moderators
AND
random components OR just moderators?
Thank you,
Simon
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________ R-sig-meta-analysis mailing list R-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-meta-analysis ------------------------------ End of R-sig-meta-analysis Digest, Vol 56, Issue 18 ***************************************************