-----Original Message-----
From: Timothy MacKenzie [mailto:fswfswt at gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 24 November, 2021 19:18
To: Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP)
Cc: R meta
Subject: Re: rma.mv for studies reporting composite of and/or individual
subscales
rma.mv(es ~ reporting:X1, vi, random = list(~1| study, ~ reporting |
obs), struct = "DIAG", subset = include == "yes")
Not sure what X1 is, but yes, this could be a plausible model,
allowing for different within-study variances for 'subscale' versus
'composite' estimates.
X1 is a moderator but I think I should keep X1 separate between studies for
which we have used their composite result and studies for which we have used
their subscale results, no?