Skip to content
Prev 3145 / 5632 Next

[R-meta] Publication bias with multivariate meta analysis

That's one of the main uses of a funnel plot: To see if it looks (roughly) symmetric or not. If it is not symmetric, then in essence this implies that there is a relationship between the estimates and whatever you put on the y-axis of the plot (typically the SEs).

There are many possible reasons for why such a relationship could exist (i.e., why the plot is not symmetric). Publication bias is one of them. For certain effect size measures, there is also an inherent relationship between the observed effects and their sampling variances (and hence SEs), so in this case the funnel plot (and methods based on it) that put the SE (or some function thereof on the y-axis) are inherently flawed. To give one example:

Pustejovsky, J. E., & Rodgers, M. A. (2019). Testing for funnel plot asymmetry of standardized mean differences. Research Synthesis Methods, 10(1), 57-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1332

Unaccounted for moderators that are related to the size of the estimates *and their SEs* could also create asymmetry.

In principle, one could also reason that asymmetry is to be expected if study authors are doing sample size calculations / power analyses before conducting their studies.

I just saw that Gerta also replied and provided a useful reference.

Best,
Wolfgang