Hello All,
Imagine a single-group experiment (same group pre- and post-tested)
has been replicated ten times with independent groups of participants
by the same lab:
R O X O ==> 10 times
In each experiment, participants answer a multiple-choice test at the
pre- and the post-test. So, participants' responses on each test item
are binary (correct, not correct).
So, we have access to the raw data. In this situation, is there any
advantage for meta-analyzing these 10 replication experiments? Can
metafor do this?
I'd highly appreciate any resources/guidance that I could access to
learn more about software, or methodology surrounding this issue.
Sincerely,
Luke