Dear Gerta,
I don't think I am bashing anybody and I am sorry if it came across this way. Anybody is free to post here. It's just nice to know who I am conversing with, especially if a post is addressing me directly.
Best,
Wolfgang
-----Original Message-----
From: Dr. Gerta R?cker [mailto:ruecker at imbi.uni-freiburg.de]
Sent: Tuesday, 29 March, 2022 23:21
To: Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP); Stefanou Revesz
Cc: R meta
Subject: Re: [R-meta] Posting to this list
Dear Wolfgang,
I read your recent post on these more general rules for the list and I
agree with most of them. However, I have a problem with this bashing of
people who do not have an official address. I worked for full 12 years
as a German Hausfrau from home. I was nowhere affiliated, but
nevertheless published as a researcher, together with my husband and his
colleagues. At that time I even didn't have an e-mail address. Now I am
retired, and when my contract as a guest scientist will end, I will lose
my e-mail address and my affiliation and, if these are the rules, will
not be allowed to post on this list. Please be aware that there are
people who retire, or get unemployed, but still do research.
In short, why does it matter where we are affiliated?
Best,
Gerta
Am 29.03.2022 um 22:54 schrieb Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP):
Is there any way this can be verified? Easiest would be to use your UCL account
-----Original Message-----
From: Stefanou Revesz [mailto:stefanourevesz at gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 29 March, 2022 22:27
To: Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP)
Cc: R meta
Subject: Re: [R-meta] Exponentiating the fixed part of rma.mv output
Hello Wolfgang,
I'm a second second year master's student in psychology at the
University College of London. I don't currently own a social media
platform or personal website (I certainly should set up one for myself
when I start to publish!). To be clear, are you asking that I should
add this information to my signature at the bottom of my gmail in my
future posts, correct?
Sincerely,
Stefanou
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 3:05 PM Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP)
<wolfgang.viechtbauer at maastrichtuniversity.nl> wrote:
Dear Stefanou,
When posting to the mailing list, please provide some information about any
institutional/organizational affiliation (such as a link to a personal
university profile page, or social media profile). Thanks!
-----Original Message-----
From: R-sig-meta-analysis [mailto:r-sig-meta-analysis-bounces at r-project.org]
Behalf Of Stefanou Revesz
Sent: Tuesday, 29 March, 2022 21:43
To: R meta
Subject: [R-meta] Exponentiating the fixed part of rma.mv output
Hello Wolfgang,
I want to exponentiate the fixed part of my model below, is there a
way to preserve the appearance of the output as in
`coef(summary(res))` but just display all the columns in their
exponentiated form?
I did try `predict(res, transf = exp)` but that is not what I'm after.
Thank you,
Stefanou
## Here is my model:
d <- read.csv("https://raw.githubusercontent.com/fpqq/w/main/f.csv")
res <- rma.mv(gi ~ teaching_level+pd_format +pd_content +
training_hr +time +outcome +area +
time_wk_whn +time_wk_btw +study_type,
V = v_gi,
random = ~1|study/obs,
data = d)