[R-meta] Compiling different design in the same met-analysis
Hi Michael, Thanks a lot for your quick response. Here are answers and other questions below. Le lun. 3 mai 2021 ? 12:41, Michael Dewey <lists at dewey.myzen.co.uk> a ?crit :
Dear Gladys Comments in-line On 03/05/2021 08:13, Gladys Barragan-Jason wrote:
Dear all, I am doing a meta-analysis on experimental data on the impact on several behavioral interventions including both *pre-post studies* (measurement of a trait before and after the intervention) *and control vs. treatment studies *(measurement after a control intervention vs. measurement after the intervention).
So the first design just has one group which is measured twice and the second design has two parallel groups which are each measured once?
Exactly!
I am interested in the effect size of each type of intervention on a specific trait that is common to all studies. I would like to know whether it is correct to compile all studies from one type of intervention (whatever the type of comparisons: pre-pot and control vs. treatment group together) with pre- and control being as control and post and treatment being as treatment.
I do not think that is going to work well. Although the two designs could be considered as estimating the same effect their variability should be very different since in design 1 you have reduced the effect of individual variability. If you do include both designs in one analysis I would have thought it mandatory to include a moderator with two levels for design.
This makes sense. When I do this, I then obtain two effect sizes (one for each design); (in having mods=~design-1). Do you know how I can get the overall effect size?
I have a second question about how to thank the r-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org <mailto:r-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org> list for all their help (acknowledgements in a paper).
I would have thought the URL
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-meta-analysis// was better. How to do this will also depend on custom and practice in your scientific discipline, some journals in mine require people who are acknowledged to give their consent.
Ok! Thanks a lot! Best, Gladys
Michael
Thanks a lot for your help! Have a great day, Gladys -- ------------------------------------------ Gladys Barragan-Jason, PhD. ____ Website <https://sites.google.com/view/gladysbarraganjason/home> Station d'Ecologie Th?orique et Exp?rimentale (SETE)____ CNRS de Moulis____ image.pngimage.png____ <
http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
Virus-free. www.avg.com <
http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
_______________________________________________ R-sig-meta-analysis mailing list R-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-meta-analysis
-- Michael http://www.dewey.myzen.co.uk/home.html
------------------------------------------ Gladys Barragan-Jason, PhD. Website <https://sites.google.com/view/gladysbarraganjason/home> Station d'Ecologie Th?orique et Exp?rimentale (SETE) CNRS de Moulis [image: image.png][image: image.png] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-meta-analysis/attachments/20210503/2e32ca3b/attachment-0001.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image004.png Type: image/png Size: 7125 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-meta-analysis/attachments/20210503/2e32ca3b/attachment-0001.png>